Search found 40 matches
- Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:02 pm
- Forum: DS/DSi Development
- Topic: Which version supports touchscreen in emulators?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5930
Re: Which version supports touchscreen in emulators?
Iirc, this problem was due to an incomplete support of FIFO in the older versions of desmume and an increased use of FIFO in later versions of libnds. Correct ?
- Tue Jan 04, 2011 4:25 pm
- Forum: libfat
- Topic: Faster writes for libFAT 1.0.7
- Replies: 10
- Views: 64879
Re: Faster writes for libFAT 1.0.7
There are also some changes which will probably make your patch fail.
I suppose you refer to the "GEKKO" modification that decides whether a "write-through" of a whole set of sector should leave a copy in the cache when there was no previous entry in the cache for them. I will ensure that I don't ...
I suppose you refer to the "GEKKO" modification that decides whether a "write-through" of a whole set of sector should leave a copy in the cache when there was no previous entry in the cache for them. I will ensure that I don't ...
- Mon Jan 03, 2011 10:29 am
- Forum: libfat
- Topic: Faster writes for libFAT 1.0.7
- Replies: 10
- Views: 64879
Re: Faster writes for libFAT 1.0.7
(...)
There are targets for each system in the Makefile, make nds-install will build and install only the nds lib.
Ok. I think I get the idea better and understand how I broke things up.
For SCSD have a look at http://eng.supercard.sc/soft_sd_2.htm for the 1.84 firmware which includes a dldi ...
There are targets for each system in the Makefile, make nds-install will build and install only the nds lib.
Ok. I think I get the idea better and understand how I broke things up.
For SCSD have a look at http://eng.supercard.sc/soft_sd_2.htm for the 1.84 firmware which includes a dldi ...
- Sat Jan 01, 2011 10:24 pm
- Forum: libfat
- Topic: Faster writes for libFAT 1.0.7
- Replies: 10
- Views: 64879
Re: Faster writes for libFAT 1.0.7
All patch submissions should be placed on the patch tracker at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=114505&atid=668553
Patches must be made against SVN HEAD and not released tarballs - bugs get fixed in SVN, tested and then released. Currently libfat 1.0.8 is waiting on some further tests but ...
Patches must be made against SVN HEAD and not released tarballs - bugs get fixed in SVN, tested and then released. Currently libfat 1.0.8 is waiting on some further tests but ...
- Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:20 pm
- Forum: libfat
- Topic: Faster writes for libFAT 1.0.7
- Replies: 10
- Views: 64879
Faster writes for libFAT 1.0.7
Hello, folks.
While updating one of my software for the latest libnds and libfat, I observed that writes to the media card was roughly 3 times slower as it was in the past with the same hardware. I first instrumented cache.c so that it gathers statistics about cache misses, cache hits, write back ...
While updating one of my software for the latest libnds and libfat, I observed that writes to the media card was roughly 3 times slower as it was in the past with the same hardware. I first instrumented cache.c so that it gathers statistics about cache misses, cache hits, write back ...
- Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:52 pm
- Forum: DS/DSi Development
- Topic: Regarding DS<->DS TCP slowness (and DSi XL hang)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 21176
Re: Regarding DS<->DS TCP slowness (and DSi XL hang)
One problem I had at the end was that I included the "sgIP_errno.h" file instead of "errno.h" and error-checking did not work at all. It defines an error variable that wasn't in use in this environment. Would it be possible to remove the file "sgIP_errno.h" from the distribution to avoid this ...
- Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:07 am
- Forum: libfat
- Topic: GetDeviceOpTab ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 68692
Re: GetDeviceOpTab ?
I'm reluctant to link to or recommend piracy tools.
But on the other hand, that's industry recognition of your proposal to a "de-facto standard". It's important to state it if you want to gain further adoption by homebrew developers.
Imho, you could achieve it by having three kind of information ...
But on the other hand, that's industry recognition of your proposal to a "de-facto standard". It's important to state it if you want to gain further adoption by homebrew developers.
Imho, you could achieve it by having three kind of information ...
- Mon Dec 20, 2010 9:28 am
- Forum: libfat
- Topic: GetDeviceOpTab ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 68692
Re: GetDeviceOpTab ?
You have some objection to hbmenu?
I think if you're fair to yourself and compare it to existing loaders, the drawback of hbmenu are clear. It has a non-appealing interface, and it doesn't run commercial games. I can perfectly understand that from a developer point of view, and I will likely ...
I think if you're fair to yourself and compare it to existing loaders, the drawback of hbmenu are clear. It has a non-appealing interface, and it doesn't run commercial games. I can perfectly understand that from a developer point of view, and I will likely ...
- Sun Dec 19, 2010 7:08 pm
- Forum: libfat
- Topic: GetDeviceOpTab ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 68692
Re: GetDeviceOpTab ?
That sounds like good news. You might want to update the wiki page, then, as it gives the impression that hbmenu is the only available option for R4 users.WinterMute wrote:WoodR4 provides argv support.
- Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:33 pm
- Forum: libfat
- Topic: GetDeviceOpTab ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 68692
Re: GetDeviceOpTab ?
Noda's EFSlib is not supported. Use libfilesystem.
I don't expect anybody @devkitpro to ensure that EFSlib keeps working with new releases of the relevant devkit parts, since it's clearly a 3rd-party library. I'm here to better understand why it's no longer working and what would work instead. I ...
I don't expect anybody @devkitpro to ensure that EFSlib keeps working with new releases of the relevant devkit parts, since it's clearly a 3rd-party library. I'm here to better understand why it's no longer working and what would work instead. I ...